Monday, July 13, 2009

पूर्ण- विराम

"अगर मैं क्षोभ या हताशा में कुछ ऐसा कह गया होऊं, जिससे आप में से किसी को कुछ अप्रिय लगा हो तो यह मान कर क्षमा करें कि इस उम्र और आपा-धापी में कभी-कभी ऐसा हो जाता है। रही 'कबाड़खाना' के अशोक पांडेय की बात, तो वे मेरे इसलिए प्रिय रहे हैं क्योंकि उनमें शायद वही संवेदना, अध्यवसाय और निस्संगता है, जो मैं अपने में पाता हूं। उन्हें समझने में भूल हुई है।"

With these lines of Mr. Uday Prakash, for me this chapter is hereby closed forever. I wish him and Ashok eternal friendship, good health and of course a shot each of Smirnoff and Absolut'. So far so good ! Bury the hatchet , draw the curtain and say good night!

4 comments:

Unknown said...

परिवार और निजी मामला बताकर तो हम हर उस शख़्स की लड़ाई को कमज़ोर ही करेंगे जो मानव विरोधी विचार से लड़ने की शुरुआत अपने घर-परिवार से विद्रोह करके ही करता है. हैरान इसलिए भी हूं कि उदय प्रकाश ख़ुद की आलोचना से सीख लेने की बजाय अपने ख़िलाफ़ कोई गहरी जातिवादी-क्शेत्रवादी साजिश देख रहे हैं. उन्हें ये साफ़ करना चाहिए कि कबाड़खाना कैसे जातिवादी ब्लॉग है. मेरी नज़र में हर जाति-धर्म-इलाक़े में पैदा हुए ऐसे लोग इस ब्लॉग से जुड़े हैं जो हर तरह की संकीर्णता के ख़िलाफ़ हैं. इनमें से कई को मैं व्यक्तिगत तौर पर जानता हूं. उनपर जातिवाद-साम्प्रदायवाद का आरोप लगाना हजम नहीं होता. क्या उदय प्रकाश इसका कोई मुकम्मल जवाब देंगे ?

डॉ.भूपेन्द्र कुमार सिंह said...

Though no need to speak on such issues which are closed but there are extremes from both sides.
No aranyarodan should have taken place after Udai jis accepting a samman because it is his personal decison what to accept and what to reject.I must convey this fact that any one or every one on this earth has a right of privacy and self decision.
You cant say yes or no on ohers behalf because he is a public figure.It will not be a democratic thing to do.
Now question of Yogi Adityanath.
In this country there are so many religions ,opinions,views and contradictions it is difficult to speak outrightly that A is secular,B is fundamntalist ,C is backing Muslims and D is against them.E IS HINDU NETA AND F IS MUSLIM JIHADI.
If we force our opinions on others by hook or by crook,it is called Dictatorship.
In democracy everyone has the right to express himself but in a democratic and civilized manner.You canT rebuke any body publicly only because he has difference of opinion WITH you.
The last and final point.
We are Indians ,no Hindu or no muslims.
Only a fool will fight for such nonsense but in recent past a special catagory has emerged which is psudo secular with double faces.
They show liberal approach for minorities and curse mejority, why?
Just to show that only we are the democrates ,we are liberal, we are angels.Others are demons.
If Modi,Yogi adityanath, Umabharti are the killers why people voted for them?Only hindu votes cant win mejority now.What communists did in their strong holds?
What SS Ray did to people of west Bengal as CM?
Was it a right way to do the things?
What Smt GAndhi did in ASSAM elections?Tough wrong should not be an example but we must remember that we must be honest while dealing with national issues.
Should Jamia Milia should have declared That they will provide legal help to culprits caught with lot of evidences of terrorism because they were Muslims?
Day light encounter was declared as consipiracy and a bold officer of our police force was humiliated after death by one of the political clouns.
Bombay martyers case is an example of nonsense created by top political bosses,so where were such human activists?
They never spoke a single word of sympathy for our SAHEEDS who died for motherland.WHY?
oNLY BECAUSE THEY CAN NOT GO AGAINST THEIR POLITICAL GOALS AND CANT TAKE RISK OF SPEAKING AGAINST WRONG PRACTICES OF MUSLIMS .
iT A POLICY OF FOOLISH NESS AND IT IS PAVING THE WAY FOR ANOTHER DIVISON.
mUSLIMS ARE OUR BROTHERS ,OUR BLOOD ,OUR FAMILY BUT SHOW AND TELL THEM IF THEY COMMIT MISTAKES.
sO YOU CANT SAY IN ABUSIVE LANGUAGE TO ONE WHO SPEAKS FOR hINDUS.
iF SOME ONE CAN SAY DAYAN TO BHARATMATA AND REMAIN MINISTER CABINET,IF ONE CAN PAINT INDIAN GODDESS NUDE AND STILL IS ADMIRED BY PSUDO SECULARISTS,WHY NOT YOGIADITYANATH BE GIVEN OPPORTUNITIES TO EXPRESS HIMSELF .AND I PERSONALLY SEE NO HARM IN TAKING A PRIZE FROM HIS HANDS. IT IS A SIN.IT IS THE CHOICE OF THE FOUNDER WHOM HE ELECTS AS HIS GUEST OF HONOUR.YES HE MUST NOT BE A DOCOIT IN PAST, A CULPRIT, A RAPIST,A FRAUD, HARMFUL TO SOCIETY BY ANY MEANS.AND YOGI IS NONE OF THE ABOVE.
iT WILL NOT BE WISE TO KINDLE FIRE LIKE THIS ANYMORE.iF YOU WISH TO FIGHT ,FIGHT FOR LITERACY,ACT IN FAVOUR OF DEMOCRACY, FIGHT AGAINST POVERTY.
BUT I KNOW THAT WE WILL NOT. .IT IS VERY EASY TO CURSE ANYBODY ON ANY FOOLISH GROUNDS ON BLOGS IN NO TIME AND BECOME POPULAR OVERNIGHT.
bE A MAN MY DEAR,BE FREE FROM PREJUDICE AND FEAR.
yOGI OR NO YOGI ,UDAI PRAKSH HAS HIS PLACE IN HISTORY OF LITERATURE AND ONE CANT DISCARD HIM ON SUCH SILLY GROUNDS.ISSUE MAY BE DISGUSTING AND DISTURBING BUT IN MY HUMBLE OPINION WE MUST THINK BEFORE WE WRITE OR SPEAK.THIS SHOULD NOT BE A COMMUNAL DEBATE INSTEAD OF A DICOURSE OF KNOWLEDGE.THER ARE SO MANY THINGS TO DO FOR THE SOCIETY AND THE NATION.TRY ENERGY IN CONSTRUCTIVE ISSUES INSTEAD OF SUCH HUE AND CRY.ITS DIRTY DRAWING ROOM POLITICS AND MUST BE AVOIDED AT ANY COST.
REGARDS.
dR.bHOOPENDRA sINGH

मुनीश ( munish ) said...

I agree Doctor!

Nanak said...
This comment has been removed by the author.